HLRGazette Archives

Relive some of our best stories.

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Obama continues drone attacks

E-mail Print PDF

New President has tripled bombing attacks over border into Pakistan since taking over from Bush!

Obama continues successful drone bombing attacks

 

Obama uses 195 Predators - which are 27 feet long and cost $4.5 million apiece - and 28 Reapers, a new, more heavily armed drone. Unmanned drones fly 34 surveillance patrols each day in Iraq and Afghanistan, up from 12 in 2006.

Obama intelligence officials call these unmanned aerial vehicles, often referred to as drones, their most effective weapon against Al Qaeda. The remotely piloted planes are used to transmit live video from Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan to American forces, and to carry out air strikes, some using the deadly Hellfire Missils to slaughter the enemy. (much worse than waterboarding them)
Predator spy planes were first used in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s. The Air Force's fleet has grown quickly in recent years, and consists of 195 Predators - which are 27 feet long and cost $4.5 million apiece - and 28 Reapers, a new, more heavily armed drone. Unmanned drones fly 34 surveillance patrols each day in Iraq and Afghanistan, up from 12 in 2006. They are also transmitting 16,000 hours of video each month, some of it directly to troops on the ground.
Despite their popularity, the drones have many shortcomings that have resulted from the rush to deploy them. Air Force officials acknowledge that more than a third of their Predators have crashed. Complaints about civilian casualties, particularly from strikes in Pakistan, have also stirred some concerns among human rights advocates.


US embassy official says terrorists must be eliminated from Pakistan and Afghanistan
By Ijaz Kakakhel
ISLAMABAD: US drone strikes in the Tribal Areas have helped achieve major goals and several terrorists have been killed in the attacks, a senior US embassy official told Daily Times.
"We respect the sovereignty of Pakistan and will do so in future, but at the same time, we have to remove militants from Afghanistan as well as Pakistan," said the official, adding that terrorists had destroyed peace in Pakistan's tribal belt and across the border in Afghanistan. The official said that several innocent people across the country had fallen victim to terrorist activities.
Meanwhile, US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson told Daily Times that Washington wanted to develop the Tribal Areas through more investment and employment opportunities. But to make the region attractive for investors, she said the law and order situation must be improved.
She said the US has promised the establishment of reconstruction opportunities zones in the Tribal Areas, but restoration of peace was pre-requisite for the plan to be successful. About increasing bilateral trade between Pakistan and the US, the ambassador said the US wanted to improve trade relations between both the government and the private sector. The ambassador made the comments at a reception in the honour of the Pakistan Business Ambassadors Mission to the United States. The Pakistani business delegation is scheduled to visit the US from April 22 to 24.


Drone missions are going to be increased and could go even deeper into Pakistan.
WASHINGTON - Despite threats of retaliation from Pakistani militants, senior administration officials said Monday that the United States intended to step up its use of drones to strike militants in Pakistan's tribal areas and might extend them to a different sanctuary deeper inside the country.
On Sunday, a senior Taliban leader vowed to unleash two suicide attacks a week like one on Saturday in Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, unless the CIA stopped firing missiles at militants. Pakistani officials have expressed concerns that the missile strikes from remotely piloted aircraft fuel more violence in the country, and some American officials say they are also concerned about some aspects of the drone strikes.
But as Adm. Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Richard C. Holbrooke, the special envoy to the region, arrived in Islamabad on Monday, the administration officials said the plan to intensify missile strikes underscored President Obama's goal to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat" al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as to strike at other militant groups allied with al-Qaeda.
Officials are also proposing to broaden the missile strikes to Baluchistan, south of the tribal areas, unless Pakistan manages to reduce the incursion of militants there.
Influential American lawmakers have voiced support for the administration's position.
Senator Levin, a Michigan Democrat who heads the Armed Services Committee, acknowledged last week that "the price is very heavy" when missile strikes mistakenly kill civilians, but he said the strikes were "an effective tool."
The plans have met strong resistance from Pakistani officials and have also worried some former American officials and some analysts, who say that strikes create greater risks of civilian casualties and could further destabilize the nuclear-armed nation.
"You will be complicating and compounding anti-Americanism here," said Talat Masood, a retired Pakistani general and military analyst in Islamabad. "How can you be an ally and at the same time be targeted?"
Some American experts say a crucial change in aerial warfare, in which American forces are now often stalking individuals rather than tanks and other large weapons as in past wars, has raised new legal issues.
A. John Radsan, who worked as a C.I.A. lawyer from 2002 to 2004, argued in a recent scholarly article he wrote with Dick Murphy, a fellow law professor, that the United States should follow the lead of the Israeli Supreme Court and require an investigation of "targeted killings" by the C.I.A. to control the practice.
While the notion of remote-control killing may seem chilling, military experts say the drones, which can transmit live video for nearly a day at a time, typically supply the weapons targeting officers with enough information to avoid civilian casualties.
Marc Garlasco, a former military targeting official who now works for Human Rights Watch, the international advocacy group, said the drones had helped limit civilian casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq, where the Air Force uses them to attack people laying roadside bombs and to attack other insurgents.
But in trying to take advantage of what can be fleeting chances to kill top Taliban and Qaeda leaders in Pakistan, the C.I.A. faces a much more difficult task, especially if it follows the targets into more populated areas.
"When you're operating under very short time frames, like the C.I.A. is in Pakistan, you are exponentially increasing the risk of killing noncombatants," Mr. Garlasco said.
In Pakistan, the extensive missile strikes have been limited to the tribal areas, and authorities say they have killed 9 of the top 25 Qaeda leaders. American officials say the missile strikes have forced some Taliban and Qaeda leaders to flee south toward Quetta, a city in the province of Baluchistan, which abuts the parts of southern Afghanistan where recent fighting has been the fiercest.
One of the prized attributes of the drones - the Cessna-size Predators and their larger and more heavily armed cousins called the Reapers - is that they can linger over an area for several days, sending back video that can be used to build a "pattern" that can be used for analysis.
Some experts have compared them to mini-satellites that can monitor a suspected terrorist compound for weeks, watching where the people go and with whom they interact, to help confirm that the right people are being singled out for attack.
Experts say the drones also carry laser-guided weapons with small warheads that are precise enough to kill a group of people in a street without damaging nearby buildings.
Like the military services, the C.I.A. uses computer software to assess possible collateral damage, and the fusing on the bombs can be adjusted to limit their impact.
But in Pakistan and Afghanistan, it can also be hard to evaluate tips about the locations of Taliban or Qaeda leaders if there are no troops nearby to help check them out.
While the Air Force operates its drones from military bases in the United States, the C.I.A. controls its fleet of Predators and Reapers from its headquarters in the U.S.
The final preparations for strikes in Pakistan take place in a crowded room lined with video screens, where C.I.A. officers work at phone banks and NSA personnel monitor electronic chatter, according to former C.I.A. officials.
The intelligence officers watch scratchy video captured by the drones, which always fly in pairs above potential targets.
According to the former officials, it is generally the head of the C.I.A.'s clandestine service or his deputy who gives the final approval for a strike. The decision about what type of weapon to use depends on the target, according to one former senior intelligence official.
Top national security leaders have approved lists of people who can be attacked, officials say, and the lawyers determine whether each attack can be justified under international law.

Last Updated on Friday, 24 April 2009 15:24  

The only searchable local paper.